History

Book of the Week: Independence Lost

[simpleazon-image align="right" asin="1400068959" locale="us" height="500" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61FsJt3CicL.jpg" width="335"]This week, I am reading Kathleen DuVal's new book [simpleazon-link asin="1400068959" locale="us"]Independence Lost: Lives on the Edge of the American Revolution[/simpleazon-link]  

Book Description From Amazon:

Over the last decade, award-winning historian Kathleen DuVal has revitalized the study of early America’s marginalized voices. Now, in Independence Lost, she recounts an untold story as rich and significant as that of the Founding Fathers: the history of the Revolutionary Era as experienced by slaves, American Indians, women, and British loyalists living on Florida’s Gulf Coast.   While citizens of the thirteen rebelling colonies came to blows with the British Empire over tariffs and parliamentary representation, the situation on the rest of the continent was even more fraught. In the Gulf of Mexico, Spanish forces clashed with Britain’s strained army to carve up the Gulf Coast, as both sides competed for allegiances with the powerful Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek nations who inhabited the region. Meanwhile, African American slaves had little control over their own lives, but some individuals found opportunities to expand their freedoms during the war.   Independence Lost reveals that individual motives counted as much as the ideals of liberty and freedom the Founders espoused: Independence had a personal as well as national meaning, and the choices made by people living outside the colonies were of critical importance to the war’s outcome. DuVal introduces us to the Mobile slave Petit Jean, who organized militias to fight the British at sea; the Chickasaw diplomat Payamataha, who worked to keep his people out of war; New Orleans merchant Oliver Pollock and his wife, Margaret O’Brien Pollock, who risked their own wealth to organize funds and garner Spanish support for the American Revolution; the half-Scottish-Creek leader Alexander McGillivray, who fought to protect indigenous interests from European imperial encroachment; the Cajun refugee Amand Broussard, who spent a lifetime in conflict with the British; and Scottish loyalists James and Isabella Bruce, whose work on behalf of the British Empire placed them in grave danger. Their lives illuminate the fateful events that took place along the Gulf of Mexico and, in the process, changed the history of North America itself.   Adding new depth and moral complexity, Kathleen DuVal reinvigorates the story of the American Revolution. Independence Lost is a bold work that fully establishes the reputation of a historian who is already regarded as one of her generation’s best.

 

What are you reading?

 

Ben Franklin's World Will "Delight Your Brain"

ben_franklins_worldWhat's your favorite magazine? Mine is Mental Floss, a periodical that provides a "liberal arts education" between its covers.

On Friday, May 29, 2015, I grew to love Mental Floss even more because they published "19 History Podcasts to Delight Your Brain" and listed (and linked!) Ben Franklin's World under the "Politics and American History" section.

Here's what they said:

BEN FRANKLIN’S WORLD

If early American history is your wheelhouse (or you want it to be), sample this show, which features historians and experts on specific, thoughtful topics. While BFW does delve into politics, I like when it veers into more personal stories, like the history of stepfamilies or the story of two women who lived as an openly married couple in the early 19th century.

Author Whitney Matheson referenced Episode 027 Lisa Wilson, A History of Stepfamilies in Early America and Episode 013 Rachel Hope Cleves, Charity and Sylvia: A Same-Sex Marriage in Early America.

Click "19 History Podcasts to Delight Your Brain" to read the rest of the great listings.

 

Book of the Week: The Remarkable Education of John Quincy Adams

[simpleazon-image align="right" asin="1137279621" locale="us" height="500" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/510QMXK-ucL.jpg" width="329"]What am I reading this week? Phyllis Lee Levin's [simpleazon-link asin="1137279621" locale="us"]The Remarkable Education of John Quincy Adams[/simpleazon-link].

Book Summary from Amazon:

A patriot by birth, John Quincy Adams's destiny was foreordained. He was not only "The Greatest Traveler of His Age," but his country's most gifted linguist and most experienced diplomat. John Quincy's world encompassed the American Revolution, the War of 1812, and the early and late Napoleonic Age. As his diplomat father's adolescent clerk and secretary, he met everyone who was anyone in Europe, including America's own luminaries and founding fathers, Franklin and Jefferson. All this made coming back to America a great challenge. But though he was determined to make his own career he was soon embarked, at Washington's appointment, on his phenomenal work aboard, as well as on a deeply troubled though loving and enduring marriage. But through all the emotional turmoil, he dedicated his life to serving his country. At 50, he returned to America to serve as Secretary of State to President Monroe. He was inaugurated President in 1824, after which he served as a stirring defender of the slaves of the Amistad rebellion and as a member of the House of Representatives from 1831 until his death in 1848. In The Remarkable Education of John Quincy Adams, Phyllis Lee Levin provides the deeply researched and beautifully written definitive biography of one of the most fascinating and towering early Americans.

 

History Fun with the Civil War Dogs

Sprocket Reading Battle LinesHave you ever read a graphic history book? My dogs have!

In fact, I have come home on two separate occasions to find Thatcher and Sprocket reading Ari Kelman's new book [simpleazon-link asin="0809094746" locale="us"]Battle Lines: A Graphic History of the Civil War[/simpleazon-link].

Initially, I was thrilled that my research assistants had finally taken a genuine interest in history--even if it was in the Civil War. However, the situation has taken an unexpected turn.

Thatcher-Reading-Battle-LinesMy dogs have taken a keen interest in Civil War-era facial hair.  Sprocket thinks his facial hair is worthy of George Pickett. Thatcher likens his beard to the one sported by Robert E. Lee.

When I inquired why they hadn't selected any Union officers for their look-alike-contest, they said none of the Union officers had good facial hair; if they grew beards they kept them too closely cropped for their tastes.

See their cited evidence of William Tecumseh Sherman, Robert Gould Shaw, Ulysses S. Grant, and Joshua Chamberlain.

Union Officers

What Do You Think?

Do Thatcher and Sprocket look like these officers?

Do you think they look like a different officer?

Confederate Hair

 

 

Book of the Week: For Fear of an Elective King

[simpleazon-image align="right" asin="0801452988" locale="us" height="500" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51gfGFapGnL.jpg" width="333"]What am I reading this week? Kathleen Bartoloni-Tuazon's [simpleazon-link asin="0801452988" locale="us"]For Fear of an Elective King: George Washington and the Presidential Title Controversy of 1789[/simpleazon-link].

Book Summary from Amazon:

In the spring of 1789, within weeks of the establishment of the new federal government based on the U.S. Constitution, the Senate and House of Representatives fell into dispute regarding how to address the president. Congress, the press, and individuals debated more than thirty titles, many of which had royal associations and some of which were clearly monarchical. For Fear of an Elective King is Kathleen Bartoloni-Tuazon's rich account of the title controversy and its meanings.

The short, intense legislative phase and the prolonged, equally intense public phase animated and shaped the new nation's broadening political community. Rather than simply reflecting an obsession with etiquette, the question challenged Americans to find an acceptable balance between power and the people’s sovereignty while assuring the country’s place in the Atlantic world. Bartoloni-Tuazon argues that the resolution of the controversy in favor of the modest title of "President" established the importance of recognition of the people's views by the president and evidence of modesty in the presidency, an approach to leadership that fledged the presidency’s power by not flaunting it.

How the country titled the president reflected the views of everyday people, as well as the recognition by social and political elites of the irony that authority rested with acquiescence to egalitarian principles. The controversy’s outcome affirmed the republican character of the country’s new president and government, even as the conflict was the opening volley in increasingly partisan struggles over executive power. As such, the dispute is as relevant today as in 1789.